Categorized | Featured

Color Calibration: Now I See Clearly

Posted on 27 April 2009 by D. Travis North

Last week, I posted that I was awaiting the arrival of my Spyder 2 Express color calibration system.  At the request of some of Shutter Photo’s readers, I am writing today as a follow-up to share my experiences.  So here’s the entire story.

First and foremost, I want to state that I was not ignorant to color calibration technology.  There are a number of devices on the market, and many photographers preech about their favorite systems.  But I was working under the misconception that my monitor was fairly accurate, so a color calibration system was something that fell to the back burner.  But then I tried to order prints.  Specifically, I ordered prints of Temple of Lights, and was greatly disappointed at how it came out.  So it was time for me to face facts:  I needed a color management solution.  So I ordered the Spyder 2 Express.  Below is a side-by-side comparison of one of my photographs, one edited before and and one after calibration.

Great Dome [singlepic id=283 w=300 float=right]

The image on the left is what I previously considered the final product.  The image on the right is how I had intended the photo to look.

Calibration does not result in an instant effect.  The image above was not changed in any way by calibrating the monitor.  However, my view and understanding of the photo during post-production has changed.  Before calibration, my monitor was a little bright and had a color shift slightly to the blue side of the spectrum.  Not realizing this, I feel that the majority of my photos were a little warmer (more yellows and reds)  and a little bit lower key (darker) than I would have liked.  Now that my monitor is calibrated, I am seeing the color as it should be.  I am no longer overcompensating for the brightness or the coldness.  My photos are now showing the colors, brightness and contrast the way I intend it.

Assuming that the majority of your viewers don’t have calibrated monitors, why does all this matter?  Two reasons:  Printing and Accuracy.  Your printer or a print service’s printer has a color profile that can be calibrated against.  But in order to do so, you will need to create a profile for your monitor.  That profile is developed as part of the calibration process.  As for accuracy…well, it should be your desire to be as accurate as possible.  But if it isn’t, be aware that most monitors are not very far off.  Those that are well calibrated may very well be owned by your next client or employer.  That’s a first impression you don’t want to mess up.

I now regret that I didn’t buy a calibration system earlier.  Seeing is believing, and I now feel like I was blind before.  Bottom line:  I can’t think of a single reason why a photographer shouldn’t have a calibration device.

Related Articles:

If you liked this post and would like to be notified of more like it, considering subscribing to Shutter Photo. E-mail and RSS options are available. Additionally, if you would like to see your work featured here, feel free to contribute to the Shutter Photo @ Flickr Group.

 
  • I think you have talked me into buying one, at least they're affordable now. The kayaking images are really quick conversions and I'm not surprised if they look a little dark as keeping detail in the white foam really pushes the other tones down. They look a little dark on my monitor too so it sounds like I'm not far off.

    Thanks for the info!

    <abbr>Kevin’s last blog post..Brentwood Regatta 2009 Photo Gallery</abbr>
  • Funny you should mention that. I had a couple of 8x10s of photos I previously printed made up at a local shop (which I've used before), and they came out incredible. Compared to the old prints, the new prints are dead-on how I anticipated it. Granted, the real test is to print through one of the online shops like Shutterfly - that would be the ultimate in frugality, but that is a test for another day. If I get something printed from one of those locations, I'll keep you posted.

    Meanwhile, the Spyder2Express is $65. Considering the type of work you do, it's worth it for the piece of mind. Albeit - on my newly calibrated monitor, I feel that most of your work is spot-on. However, there are still some that you may tweak differently. Your photos from your post, Analysis of a Kayaking Photoshoot, seem to be a little dark (except for the last shot) and a little cold. But again, it's a preference thing...so I can't definitively say that you'd do anything differently.

    I guess it's about control...and as a photographer, I like to have control.
  • Hi Travis,

    Thanks for the update. It might be time for me to make the plunge as well. Let us know how much better the prints look when you have some made.

    <abbr>Kevin’s last blog post..Brentwood Regatta 2009 Photo Gallery</abbr>
blog comments powered by Disqus

Photos From the SP @ Flickr Pool

See all photos

  • RANDOM POSTS

    • Help Me Plan a Photo Tour of Philadelphia (And Win a Free Print)
    • The Gallery
    • Sign of the Times
    • Photography Niches You Never Considered
    • Instant Results Stiffle Creativity?