"Lines" by Sue Thompson

“Lines” by Sue Thompson

February 08, 2011 / by
"Lines" by Sue Thompson

"Lines" by Sue Thompson

Sue Thompson is a bit of a perennial here at Shutter Photo.  Her simple, curious and refreshing approach to photography has captured our attention many times in the past.  Well, we just can’t stop watching her photostream and we love to watch her grow as a photographer.  We can’t ignore one of her recent uploads, the simply named:  Lines. It is a simple study featuring one of the most basic building blocks.

In concept, there’s not really much to this abstract photo.  But that’s why we like it.  The physical subject isn’t easily identifiable.  All we know is that it’s some sort of cube, and the top surface is reflective.  You’ve heard it from me before, but I’ll say it again:  It doesn’t always matter if the viewer cannot identify the physical subject.  For that matter, the physical subject doesn’t matter with abstract photography.  Because the actual subject is the building block itself:  Line.  Assuming my observation skills aren’t fighting me, the background is a set of blinds covering a window.  So the background also serves as a light source – natural light to boot.  It’s a good thing Sue has that nice reflective surface to play with.  I especially love how the cube is not even and the fun line textures that result.

The concept simple and fun and it’s executed well.  But I do wish Sue would have played a little bit more with the shot.  Lines snapped to a 90 degree angle are rigid and strong but lacks the whimsical feel of diagonal lines.  It might have been a fun approach to introduce a clear diagonal element to the otherwise rigid composition.  I’m not saying that Sue should have changed the perspective, I am merely suggesting one simple tweak:  Rotate the cube about 30 degrees.   The lines in the background would hold the structure.  Even the orientation of the lines in the reflection wouldn’t change.  But rotating the cube would introduce some definitive diagonal lines with its edges.  Such a subtle tweak would make this a much stronger photo.

Sue Thompson has no shortage of things to shoot.  One of the things we admire about Sue is that she never stops shooting.  And she shares everything.  So if you have run out of ideas for yourself, you might want to pop on over to Sue’s Photostream to get some subject ideas.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

D. Travis North is a professional Landscape Architect, a Freelance Photographer and founder of Shutter Photo. Ever since he picked up his first SLR, his father's Nikon N2000, he's been hooked on photography. Travis likes to photograph urban environments, architectural details and has a new-found interest in close-up photography. His work can be found at D. Travis North Photography. Follow Travis on twitter: @dtnorth.

3 Responses
  1. Sue90ca

    Thanks for this…always a thrill to see you featuring my work.
    Sue

    Feb.08.2011 at 2:45 pm
  2. jos

    Fully agree with your admiration of Sues work. I’ve mentioned this already before in this corner.

    I don’t agree fully about the diagonal remark. I think in general this is true. I also always emphasize the dynamical effect of diagonals. But i see this pic a bit as a formal one, just making a statement, not about relations and dynamics, in which diagonals can play their role.
    .
    I think the reflection becomes bolder in this way (but yes, it would be interesting to see a series of it) and gives it a stronger statement (“i am here; it’s just like this” ~~ can’t explain easily in english what i exactly mean with this. It’s a bit a feeling about Strong Presence, like in an advertisement).
    I like the angle of the object vs the blinds (?) There is also a kind of inner/outer feeling. This box seems to absorb the lines of the blinds :) ))
    Very clever compo, interesting pic

    Feb.09.2011 at 7:00 am
    • D. Travis North (Author)

      I understand what you’re saying. I’ll admit, I hadn’t thought of it in that manner (a more “formal” alignment). Now I’m on the fence about whether I would like it better with an angle or not.

      Feb.09.2011 at 7:41 am