<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Merits of a Pocket Camera</title> <atom:link href="http://www.shutterphoto.net/article/the-merits-of-a-pocket-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.shutterphoto.net/article/the-merits-of-a-pocket-camera/</link> <description>photography education, inspiration and wisdom</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:35:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: D. Travis North</title><link>http://www.shutterphoto.net/article/the-merits-of-a-pocket-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link> <dc:creator>D. Travis North</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:19:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shutterphoto.net/?p=1932#comment-437</guid> <description>The Canon G11 ($480), Nikon Coolpix L110 ($280), Nikon Coolpix P100 ($400) are all viable options that don&#039;t have shutter delays.  Sure, they&#039;re nearly as much as a small DSLR - but you&#039;d be carrying them for a different reason (&#039;cause it&#039;s compact).  But I&#039;m not saying there aren&#039;t downfalls.  But the biggest advantage of the pocket cameras are convenience - the best is the one with you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Canon G11 ($480), Nikon Coolpix L110 ($280), Nikon Coolpix P100 ($400) are all viable options that don&#39;t have shutter delays.  Sure, they&#39;re nearly as much as a small DSLR &#8211; but you&#39;d be carrying them for a different reason (&#39;cause it&#39;s compact).  But I&#39;m not saying there aren&#39;t downfalls.  But the biggest advantage of the pocket cameras are convenience &#8211; the best is the one with you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Coastwatcher</title><link>http://www.shutterphoto.net/article/the-merits-of-a-pocket-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link> <dc:creator>Coastwatcher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:10:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shutterphoto.net/?p=1932#comment-436</guid> <description>Nice article, but I&#039;m waiting with bated breath to hear about a non-SLR digital camera with the least amount of shutter delay. Sometimes it&#039;s not possible to carry the SLR everywhere. Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, but I&#39;m waiting with bated breath to hear about a non-SLR digital camera with the least amount of shutter delay. Sometimes it&#39;s not possible to carry the SLR everywhere. Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: D. Travis North</title><link>http://www.shutterphoto.net/article/the-merits-of-a-pocket-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link> <dc:creator>D. Travis North</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:19:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shutterphoto.net/?p=1932#comment-415</guid> <description>The Canon G11 ($480), Nikon Coolpix L110 ($280), Nikon Coolpix P100 ($400) are all viable options that don&#039;t have shutter delays.  Sure, they&#039;re nearly as much as a small DSLR - but you&#039;d be carrying them for a different reason (&#039;cause it&#039;s compact).  But I&#039;m not saying there aren&#039;t downfalls.  But the biggest advantage of the pocket cameras are convenience - the best is the one with you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Canon G11 ($480), Nikon Coolpix L110 ($280), Nikon Coolpix P100 ($400) are all viable options that don&#39;t have shutter delays.  Sure, they&#39;re nearly as much as a small DSLR &#8211; but you&#39;d be carrying them for a different reason (&#39;cause it&#39;s compact).  But I&#39;m not saying there aren&#39;t downfalls.  But the biggest advantage of the pocket cameras are convenience &#8211; the best is the one with you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Coastwatcher</title><link>http://www.shutterphoto.net/article/the-merits-of-a-pocket-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link> <dc:creator>Coastwatcher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:10:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shutterphoto.net/?p=1932#comment-414</guid> <description>Nice article, but I&#039;m waiting with bated breath to hear about a non-SLR digital camera with the least amount of shutter delay. Sometimes it&#039;s not possible to carry the SLR everywhere. Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, but I&#39;m waiting with bated breath to hear about a non-SLR digital camera with the least amount of shutter delay. Sometimes it&#39;s not possible to carry the SLR everywhere. Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/17 queries in 0.028 seconds using disk

Served from: www.shutterphoto.net @ 2010-08-01 07:57:30 -->